x86/coco：需要在 CoCo 系统上使用 RDRAND 播种 RNG (CVE-2024-35875)
CVE编号
CVE-2024-35875利用情况
暂无补丁情况
N/A披露时间
2024-05-19漏洞描述
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND. If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources, but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic. This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more theoretical. So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot. Add this deliberately to be "just a CoCo x86 driver feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any driver can call it with seed data of any quality, or even garbage quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to build something into the core of the RNG, consider the particular CoCo issue just a CoCo issue, and therefore separate it all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code. [ bp: Massage commit message. ]解决建议
建议您更新当前系统或软件至最新版，完成漏洞的修复。受影响软件情况
| # | 类型 | 厂商 | 产品 | 版本 | 影响面 | ||||
| 1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 运行在以下环境 | |||||||||
| 系统 | debian_12 | linux | * | Up to (excluding) 6.1.85-1 | |||||
- 攻击路径 N/A
- 攻击复杂度 N/A
- 权限要求 N/A
- 影响范围 N/A
- 用户交互 N/A
- 可用性 N/A
- 保密性 N/A
- 完整性 N/A
| CWE-ID | 漏洞类型 |
Exp相关链接
版权声明
本站原创文章转载请注明文章出处及链接，谢谢合作！
评论